Proving Properties Of Mappings In Set Theory A Comprehensive Guide

by ADMIN 67 views
Iklan Headers

In mathematics, specifically within set theory, mappings (or functions) play a pivotal role. Understanding the behavior of functions when applied to sets and their operations is crucial for advanced mathematical studies. This article delves into proving several fundamental properties of mappings, focusing on how functions interact with set operations such as union, intersection, and set difference. We aim to provide a comprehensive explanation and rigorous proofs for each property, making this a valuable resource for students and enthusiasts of mathematics. This exploration will enhance your understanding of set theory and mappings, solidifying your grasp on mathematical functions and their properties.

a) Proof: f(A ∪ B) = f(A) ∪ f(B) for any A, B ⊆ X

The union of sets is a fundamental concept in set theory. When dealing with mappings, understanding how a function operates on the union of two sets is essential. Here, we aim to prove that the image of the union of two sets A and B under a mapping f is equal to the union of the images of A and B under the same mapping. This property highlights the distributive nature of functions over set unions.

To rigorously establish this, we must show inclusion in both directions: first, that f(A ∪ B) is a subset of f(A) ∪ f(B), and then that f(A) ∪ f(B) is a subset of f(A ∪ B). This two-way inclusion will confirm the equality of the two sets.

Proof:

Let f: X → Y be a mapping, and let A, B ⊆ X. We want to prove that f(A ∪ B) = f(A) ∪ f(B).

  1. f(A ∪ B) ⊆ f(A) ∪ f(B)

    To show this inclusion, let's take an arbitrary element y ∈ f(A ∪ B). By the definition of the image of a set under a mapping, there exists an element x ∈ A ∪ B such that f(x) = y. Since x ∈ A ∪ B, this means x ∈ A or x ∈ B (or both).

    • If x ∈ A, then f(x) ∈ f(A). Since f(x) = y, we have y ∈ f(A).
    • If x ∈ B, then f(x) ∈ f(B). Since f(x) = y, we have y ∈ f(B).

    In either case, y ∈ f(A) or y ∈ f(B), which means y ∈ f(A) ∪ f(B). Therefore, if y ∈ f(A ∪ B), then y ∈ f(A) ∪ f(B). This shows that f(A ∪ B) ⊆ f(A) ∪ f(B).

  2. f(A) ∪ f(B) ⊆ f(A ∪ B)

    Now, let's take an arbitrary element y ∈ f(A) ∪ f(B). By the definition of the union of sets, this means y ∈ f(A) or y ∈ f(B) (or both).

    • If y ∈ f(A), then there exists an element x ∈ A such that f(x) = y. Since A ⊆ A ∪ B, we also have x ∈ A ∪ B. Thus, y = f(x) ∈ f(A ∪ B).
    • If y ∈ f(B), then there exists an element x ∈ B such that f(x) = y. Since B ⊆ A ∪ B, we also have x ∈ A ∪ B. Thus, y = f(x) ∈ f(A ∪ B).

    In either case, if y ∈ f(A) ∪ f(B), then y ∈ f(A ∪ B). This demonstrates that f(A) ∪ f(B) ⊆ f(A ∪ B).

Since we have shown inclusion in both directions, we can conclude that f(A ∪ B) = f(A) ∪ f(B).

This completes the proof for the first property, illustrating how the image of the union of two sets under a mapping is indeed the union of their individual images. This is a fundamental concept in set theory and provides a foundation for understanding more complex properties of mappings.

b) Proof: f⁻¹(A ∪ B) = f⁻¹(A) ∪ f⁻¹(B) for any A, B ⊆ Y

The preimage of a set under a mapping is a critical concept in understanding how functions map sets from their codomain back to their domain. This property explores how the preimage of the union of two sets behaves. We aim to prove that the preimage of the union of sets A and B is equal to the union of the preimages of A and B. This property further emphasizes the function's consistent behavior with set operations, particularly unions.

To prove this equality, we again need to demonstrate inclusion in both directions: first showing that f⁻¹(A ∪ B) ⊆ f⁻¹(A) ∪ f⁻¹(B), and then that f⁻¹(A) ∪ f⁻¹(B) ⊆ f⁻¹(A ∪ B). This rigorous approach will confirm the equivalence of the two sets.

Proof:

Let f: X → Y be a mapping, and let A, B ⊆ Y. We want to prove that f⁻¹(A ∪ B) = f⁻¹(A) ∪ f⁻¹(B).

  1. f⁻¹(A ∪ B) ⊆ f⁻¹(A) ∪ f⁻¹(B)

    Let x ∈ f⁻¹(A ∪ B). By the definition of the preimage, this means that f(x) ∈ A ∪ B. Since f(x) is in the union of A and B, it must be in A or B (or both).

    • If f(x) ∈ A, then by the definition of the preimage, x ∈ f⁻¹(A).
    • If f(x) ∈ B, then by the definition of the preimage, x ∈ f⁻¹(B).

    Thus, x ∈ f⁻¹(A) or x ∈ f⁻¹(B), which means x ∈ f⁻¹(A) ∪ f⁻¹(B). Therefore, if x ∈ f⁻¹(A ∪ B), then x ∈ f⁻¹(A) ∪ f⁻¹(B). This shows that f⁻¹(A ∪ B) ⊆ f⁻¹(A) ∪ f⁻¹(B).

  2. f⁻¹(A) ∪ f⁻¹(B) ⊆ f⁻¹(A ∪ B)

    Now, let x ∈ f⁻¹(A) ∪ f⁻¹(B). This means that x ∈ f⁻¹(A) or x ∈ f⁻¹(B) (or both).

    • If x ∈ f⁻¹(A), then f(x) ∈ A. Since A ⊆ A ∪ B, we have f(x) ∈ A ∪ B. By the definition of the preimage, this means x ∈ f⁻¹(A ∪ B).
    • If x ∈ f⁻¹(B), then f(x) ∈ B. Since B ⊆ A ∪ B, we have f(x) ∈ A ∪ B. By the definition of the preimage, this means x ∈ f⁻¹(A ∪ B).

    In either case, if x ∈ f⁻¹(A) ∪ f⁻¹(B), then x ∈ f⁻¹(A ∪ B). This demonstrates that f⁻¹(A) ∪ f⁻¹(B) ⊆ f⁻¹(A ∪ B).

Since we have shown inclusion in both directions, we can conclude that f⁻¹(A ∪ B) = f⁻¹(A) ∪ f⁻¹(B).

This completes the proof for the second property, illustrating how the preimage of the union of two sets under a mapping is indeed the union of their individual preimages. This property reinforces the predictable nature of mappings when dealing with set unions and preimages.

c) Proof: f⁻¹(A ∩ B) = f⁻¹(A) ∩ f⁻¹(B) for any A, B ⊆ Y

In set theory, the intersection operation is as crucial as the union. This property delves into how the preimage of the intersection of two sets behaves under a mapping. We aim to prove that the preimage of the intersection of sets A and B is equal to the intersection of the preimages of A and B. This showcases the function's consistent behavior across set operations, specifically intersections.

To rigorously establish this equality, we must demonstrate inclusion in both directions: first showing that f⁻¹(A ∩ B) ⊆ f⁻¹(A) ∩ f⁻¹(B), and then that f⁻¹(A) ∩ f⁻¹(B) ⊆ f⁻¹(A ∩ B). This methodical approach will confirm the equivalence of the two sets.

Proof:

Let f: X → Y be a mapping, and let A, B ⊆ Y. We want to prove that f⁻¹(A ∩ B) = f⁻¹(A) ∩ f⁻¹(B).

  1. f⁻¹(A ∩ B) ⊆ f⁻¹(A) ∩ f⁻¹(B)

    Let x ∈ f⁻¹(A ∩ B). By the definition of the preimage, this means that f(x) ∈ A ∩ B. Since f(x) is in the intersection of A and B, it must be in both A and B.

    • Since f(x) ∈ A, by the definition of the preimage, x ∈ f⁻¹(A).
    • Since f(x) ∈ B, by the definition of the preimage, x ∈ f⁻¹(B).

    Thus, x ∈ f⁻¹(A) and x ∈ f⁻¹(B), which means x ∈ f⁻¹(A) ∩ f⁻¹(B). Therefore, if x ∈ f⁻¹(A ∩ B), then x ∈ f⁻¹(A) ∩ f⁻¹(B). This shows that f⁻¹(A ∩ B) ⊆ f⁻¹(A) ∩ f⁻¹(B).

  2. f⁻¹(A) ∩ f⁻¹(B) ⊆ f⁻¹(A ∩ B)

    Now, let x ∈ f⁻¹(A) ∩ f⁻¹(B). This means that x ∈ f⁻¹(A) and x ∈ f⁻¹(B).

    • Since x ∈ f⁻¹(A), we have f(x) ∈ A.
    • Since x ∈ f⁻¹(B), we have f(x) ∈ B.

    Since f(x) ∈ A and f(x) ∈ B, we have f(x) ∈ A ∩ B. By the definition of the preimage, this means x ∈ f⁻¹(A ∩ B). Therefore, if x ∈ f⁻¹(A) ∩ f⁻¹(B), then x ∈ f⁻¹(A ∩ B). This demonstrates that f⁻¹(A) ∩ f⁻¹(B) ⊆ f⁻¹(A ∩ B).

Since we have shown inclusion in both directions, we can conclude that f⁻¹(A ∩ B) = f⁻¹(A) ∩ f⁻¹(B).

This completes the proof for the third property, illustrating how the preimage of the intersection of two sets under a mapping is indeed the intersection of their individual preimages. This property reinforces the consistent behavior of mappings when dealing with set intersections and preimages.

d) Proof: f⁻¹(A \ B) = f⁻¹(A) \ f⁻¹(B) for any A, B ⊆ Y

The set difference operation is another fundamental concept in set theory. This property explores how the preimage of the set difference of two sets behaves under a mapping. We aim to prove that the preimage of A \ B (the set of elements in A but not in B) is equal to the set difference of the preimages of A and B. This property highlights how functions interact with set differences, providing a comprehensive understanding of function behavior across various set operations.

To rigorously establish this equality, we must demonstrate inclusion in both directions: first showing that f⁻¹(A \ B) ⊆ f⁻¹(A) \ f⁻¹(B), and then that f⁻¹(A) \ f⁻¹(B) ⊆ f⁻¹(A \ B). This meticulous approach will confirm the equivalence of the two sets.

Proof:

Let f: X → Y be a mapping, and let A, B ⊆ Y. We want to prove that f⁻¹(A \ B) = f⁻¹(A) \ f⁻¹(B).

  1. f⁻¹(A \ B) ⊆ f⁻¹(A) \ f⁻¹(B)

    Let x ∈ f⁻¹(A \ B). By the definition of the preimage, this means that f(x) ∈ A \ B. By the definition of set difference, this means f(x) ∈ A and f(x) ∉ B.

    • Since f(x) ∈ A, by the definition of the preimage, x ∈ f⁻¹(A).
    • Since f(x) ∉ B, x ∉ f⁻¹(B) (because if x were in f⁻¹(B), then f(x) would be in B).

    Thus, x ∈ f⁻¹(A) and x ∉ f⁻¹(B), which means x ∈ f⁻¹(A) \ f⁻¹(B). Therefore, if x ∈ f⁻¹(A \ B), then x ∈ f⁻¹(A) \ f⁻¹(B). This shows that f⁻¹(A \ B) ⊆ f⁻¹(A) \ f⁻¹(B).

  2. f⁻¹(A) \ f⁻¹(B) ⊆ f⁻¹(A \ B)

    Now, let x ∈ f⁻¹(A) \ f⁻¹(B). This means that x ∈ f⁻¹(A) and x ∉ f⁻¹(B).

    • Since x ∈ f⁻¹(A), we have f(x) ∈ A.
    • Since x ∉ f⁻¹(B), we have f(x) ∉ B (because if f(x) were in B, then x would be in f⁻¹(B)).

    Since f(x) ∈ A and f(x) ∉ B, we have f(x) ∈ A \ B. By the definition of the preimage, this means x ∈ f⁻¹(A \ B). Therefore, if x ∈ f⁻¹(A) \ f⁻¹(B), then x ∈ f⁻¹(A \ B). This demonstrates that f⁻¹(A) \ f⁻¹(B) ⊆ f⁻¹(A \ B).

Since we have shown inclusion in both directions, we can conclude that f⁻¹(A \ B) = f⁻¹(A) \ f⁻¹(B).

This completes the proof for the fourth property, illustrating how the preimage of the set difference of two sets under a mapping is indeed the set difference of their individual preimages. This property provides a complete picture of how mappings interact with various set operations.

Conclusion

In this article, we have rigorously proven several fundamental properties of mappings in set theory. Specifically, we demonstrated how functions behave with set operations like union, intersection, and set difference, both for images and preimages. These proofs not only enhance our understanding of mathematical functions but also lay a solid foundation for more advanced mathematical concepts. Grasping these properties is crucial for anyone studying mathematics, as they form the bedrock for further exploration in abstract algebra, topology, and analysis.

By understanding these properties, students and enthusiasts can better appreciate the elegance and consistency of mathematical structures. These proofs provide a clear and logical pathway to understanding the interplay between functions and sets, reinforcing the importance of set theory in the broader mathematical landscape. Whether you are a student tackling coursework or a mathematics enthusiast seeking deeper knowledge, this exploration of function properties serves as a valuable resource.